Why You’re Not Like Facebook (But You Could Be)

This is about two companies: 

One is a current client of mine, a company which has defied the odds by remaining profitable (and even growing a bit) through the Great Recession, basically by doing what it does very well despite the economic pressures.  Alas, it’s slipped a bit in recent months, as several of the markets in which it operates are feeling the (thus far) little-discussed second wave of the recession, a wave prompted by recent layoffs of state and county employees as federal support funding is cut back.  Still, this client boasts higher average traffic counts and margins than most of its peers, and will survive, thrive and grow as it finds a way to reach out to other, less government-dependent markets.

The other is Facebook, a company which has made itself the center of most market discussions for the past several months.  Unless you were in a coma (or solitary) for a prolonged period, you’ve probably heard that Facebook went through its IPO recently.  There are a raft of stories which will be told about the screwups -- and possibly worse -- around the IPO, but you’ll read about them elsewhere.  What I want to point out is the difference between Facebook and your company, or my client.

My client, like most restaurant companies and many others, is built off the quaint notion that income comes from providing a product and/or service to each customer.  Restaurant companies are a bit unique in that they provide both a product AND a service in most instances.  Whether the product is ordered a la carte, served as a buffet, or as a prix fixe menu, the base service cost is factored into the price.  Social convention, and economic reality, have established the practice of the customer adding a service surcharge (tip) in many circumstances, and the restaurateur will keep that surcharge’s existence in mind when setting prices and allocating costs.

Facebook’s model is different, and in many ways very clever: it provides a free service to its users.  The users, in return, provide personal data, references (friends), and examples of behavior (click here if you like ____).  Facebook then absorbs and analyzes this data and sells it to the parties who intend to make use of it for advertising, cause marketing, or the sale of games and other virtual products tailored to the Facebook audience.  The underlying premise of this business model, dating back long before Facebook, is that a sufficiently large user group must be worth something, and the more data which can be collected, the greater the value per user, as that data provides advertisers with an ever-more-precise way to reach the exact target consumer they seek.

So ... every day, my client’s consumers cast a vote for its continued success -- or against it.  Every day, the restaurateur tailors his or her operation just a bit based on those votes.  Restaurants may seek to add customers, or not, depending on the results; sometimes they’ll conclude it’s better to raise the prices a bit in order to cut down on the crowds or manage against limited supplies.  (I know, most of you haven’t said that lately, but at other points in the cycle it’s been a very practical choice.)

On the other hand, the Facebook model has tended to reward companies for giving away more (new features, primarily) in order to constantly add new users and hold existing users for just two more minutes during each visit.  Again, the theory is that the more visitors, and the more visits, the more value that must equate to for SOMEONE.

There are now internet companies trying to break out of this model.  Many newspapers and magazines are limiting access to certain features, or permitting only (gasp) paid subscribers access to certain features.  For them, the volume model hasn’t translated to profits.  It’s an open question how it’ll all shake out, although there’s clear evidence that there’s at least SOME value to large user lists.  The question which won’t be answered for some time is whether that value reaches $38 per share.

Interestingly, no company which actually provides concrete (as opposed to virtual) products has expressed any interest in exploring the Facebook model, simply because they must recoup all the cost of the product and affiliated service before trying to mine the customer relationship for other value.  I don’t count the Panera “pay what you like” stores as a form of this model; there’s a clear explanation, and expectation, that while the store is providing a public good, it also requires the support of at least most of its patrons to keep the experiment alive.

I’d also recommend an interesting piece by Ross Douthat of the New York Times, on May 27, which explores this question from a different angle.  It can be found at The Facebook Illusion.

Views: 69

Tags: expenses, profit_model


You need to be a member of FohBoh to add comments!

Join FohBoh




Social Wine Club for Craft Wineries


Chains make chicken the star of the menu

High beef and pork prices are making chicken the go-to meat more than ever, boosting wholesale prices for producers and spurr -More

Americans continue to eat less fish

The average American is consuming only 14.4 pounds of fish per year, down from the record high of 16.6 pounds in 2004, Ben Di -More


Posting a job or finding a job starts here at FohBoh. Call us about special $25 posting packages to syndicate across all major jobs boards.

National News

Rita's Italian Ice Awards Area Development Agreement for Kansas

Rita's Italian Ice has awarded franchise and area development agreements for Kansas and the Kansas City area, which extends to the Missouri side of the city, to franchisees and local residents Jay Miller, Jeff Miller and Pat Reilly.

Restaurant Sales Bounced Back in March

Restaurant sales posted a solid gain in March, and bounced back completely from the recent soft patch. Eating and drinking place sales totaled $47.3 billion on a seasonally-adjusted basis in March, up 1.1 percent from February's upward-revised sales volume of $46.8 billion, according to preliminary figures from the U.S. Census Bureau.

McAlister's Deli Signs Franchise Agreement to Expand to Cleveland

McAlister's Deli announced it has signed a development agreement with an experienced multi-unit operator to develop three restaurants in the Cleveland, Ohio, area - the brand's first locations in the market.

Restaurant Trends - Growing And Emerging Concepts - Change and Activity April 16, 2014

Update from Restaurantchains.net on growing and emerging restaurant concepts

Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen, Inc. Announces CFO Departure in May

The company has commenced a search for Mr. Hope’s successor, reviewing both internal and external candidates. Mr. Hope will assist in the transition of duties to an interim CFO and will remain a consultant to the company through the summer.


If you are looking for capital to start or grow your restaurant, create the next 501c3, develop and launch the next app for the restaurant industry,or want to help your peers in some meaningful way, we want to know about it.


TED: Norman Spack: How I help transgender teens become who they want to be - Norman Spack (2013)

Puberty is an awkward time for just about everybody, but for transgender teens it can be a nightmare, as they grow overnight into bodies they aren't comfortable with. In a heartfelt talk, endocrinologist Norman Spack tells a personal story of how he became one of the few doctors in the US to treat minors with hormone replacement therapy. By staving off the effects of puberty, Spack gives trans teens the time they need. (Filmed at TEDxBeaconStreet.)

TED: Jennifer Senior: For parents, happiness is a very high bar - Jennifer Senior (2014)

The parenting section of the bookstore is overwhelming—it's "a giant, candy-colored monument to our collective panic," as writer Jennifer Senior puts it. Why is parenthood filled with so much anxiety? Because the goal of modern, middle-class parents—to raise happy children—is so elusive. In this honest talk, she offers some kinder and more achievable aims.

TED: David Brooks: Should you live for your résumé ... or your eulogy? - David Brooks (2014)

Within each of us are two selves, suggests David Brooks in this meditative short talk: the self who craves success, who builds a résumé, and the self who seeks connection, community, love -- the values that make for a great eulogy. (Joseph Soloveitchik has called these selves "Adam I" and "Adam II.") Brooks asks: Can we balance these two selves?

TED: David Sengeh: The sore problem of prosthetic limbs - David Sengeh (2014)

What drove David Sengeh to create a more comfortable prosthetic limb? He grew up in Sierra Leone, and too many of the people he loves are missing limbs after the brutal civil war there. When he noticed that people who had prosthetics weren’t actually wearing them, the TED Fellow set out to discover why — and to solve the problem with his team from the MIT Media Lab.

© 2014   Created by FohBoh.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service