OK.  I’ll ask you to bear with me a bit on this one, as I’m starting well out in left field.  (Or, to really milk the analogy, somewhere behind the first violins.)

One of the things I like about The Economist -- both print and online -- is that it manages to provide deep, generally thoughtful coverage on business, finance, and political issues while acknowledging that there are other meaningful things in the world.  Its science section is generally informative and thought-provoking, and it provides the basis for this little note.

This week’s issue includes a piece (Conducting) summarizing a study conducted by Alessandro D’Ausilio of the Italian Institute of Technology, and recently published, which attempts to determine whether orchestral conductors really do anything useful.  I found it interesting for a few reasons: first, because (as I’ve mentioned before), I’m a recovering musician and still a fan; second, because it’s a question many musicians and non-musicians have raised over the years; and finally, because I believe it suggests some lessons which apply in Front Of House and Back Of House management settings, as well as any other setting where teams operate under direct or indirect supervision.

I won’t recount the study itself.  If you’re interested, the link above gives a thorough description of the methods and technologies employed to reach its conclusion.  What I will observe is that the study concluded that strong-willed leaders (in this setting) brought forth a superior performance from their teams, or staff, but only so long as they were able to impose their will on said staff.  The contra-assertion was also true in this study: strong-willed leaders who were, for whatever reason, NOT able to impose their wills were deemed to bring forth a less satisfactory performance from their staff.  So far, I agree, and I think we’ve all seen examples of both, whether in restaurants, military units, sports teams, or a multitude of other settings: the strong-willed leader who is able to convince his/her team to subvert their individual personalities or preferences for the good of the team usually brings forth the best performance.

The really interesting part of the study, for me, was the other finding, which was somewhat buried, but which is, I think, more applicable to most of our situations.  The study also included a conductor (read: leader) not generally perceived as domineering, or strong-willed.  That leader was given the same team to work with -- skilled musicians in this case, but any trained team will suffice for my inference.  Mr. D’Ausilio and his researchers noted that the team’s performance gelled because they fed off each other’s input, particularly in the absence of strong leadership, and sometimes despite it!  In all instances EXCEPT where the leader fully imposed his/her will on the team, the evaluators determined that the self-directed team (my words, but it seems a fair description for the results which Mr. D’Ausilio observed) provided a more satisfactory performance than those of a team in conflict with its leader.

A glib conclusion might be that von Karajan, or General Patton, or Bear Bryant, will get the best results, but that only a few von Karajans or Pattons and Bryants exist, and the rest of us should make certain that our team members are able to not only think for themselves, but to respond to guidance from each other, in order to perform well under pressure.  I’m sure all of us who are team leaders believe we have the strength and vision of von Karajan, Patton, and Bryant, but I’m equally sure most of us don’t, because there are so few really topnotch leaders, so we’d best make sure we look good by assembling superior teams which are able to guide themselves -- and then get out of the way, or at worst wave a baton from time to time so the world still sees us as leaders!

Views: 33

Tags: leadership, teamwork


You need to be a member of FohBoh to add comments!

Join FohBoh




Social Wine Club for Craft Wineries


Restaurants may feel the pinch of pricier coffee later this year

Prices for arabica coffee futures hit a 26-month high amid a drought in Brazil, which produces a third of the world's coffee  -More

McDonald's rules out all-day breakfast in push to simplify

McDonald's breakfast menu accounts for 25% of the chain's U.S.  -More

Easy ways to use 5 uncommon spring greens

As light, crisp greens arrive at farmers markets and grocery stores, chefs are finding creative ways to add them to spring me -More


Posting a job or finding a job starts here at FohBoh. Call us about special $25 posting packages to syndicate across all major jobs boards.

National News

National Restaurant Association Offers Training DVDs on Harassment Prevention, Social Media Use, and Customer Service

The National Restaurant Association has released three new DVDs that offer best practices in dealing with harassment and discrimination, customer service training, and the first of its kind video guide on the use of social media.

Yum! Brands Reports First-Quarter EPS Growth of 24% Excluding Special Items

China Division System Sales Increased 17% with Operating Profit Growth of 80%; Yum! Reaffirms Full-Year Guidance of at Lea

Souplantation & Sweet Tomatoes Certified As Nation's Largest 'Green' Restaurant Chain

National Group Salutes Country's Only Large Restaurant Group to be 'Certified Green Restaurants®'

National Restaurant Association and EatStreet Release Online Ordering Guide

The National Restaurant Association and EatStreet have released a free educational guide focusing on online ordering and emerging restaurant technology trends.

Boyd's Coffee Launches Single-Cup Coffees For Retail And Foodservice

The coffees come in a variety of roast levels and include organic and Rainforest Alliance Certified™ options: French No. 6®, Red Wagon® Organic Coffee, Good Morning™, Hi-Rev® (delivers more caffeine), and Lost Lake™ Decaf Organic Coffee.


If you are looking for capital to start or grow your restaurant, create the next 501c3, develop and launch the next app for the restaurant industry,or want to help your peers in some meaningful way, we want to know about it.


TED: Hamish Jolly: A shark-deterrent wetsuit (and it's not what you think) - Hamish Jolly (2013)

Hamish Jolly, an ocean swimmer in Australia, wanted a wetsuit that would deter a curious shark from mistaking him for a potential source of nourishment. (Which, statistically, is rare, but certainly a fate worth avoiding.) Working with a team of scientists, he and his friends came up with a fresh approach — not a shark cage, not a suit of chain-mail, but a sleek suit that taps our growing understanding of shark vision.

TED: Michel Laberge: How synchronized hammer strikes could generate nuclear fusion - Michel Laberge (2014)

Our energy future depends on nuclear fusion, says Michel Laberge. The plasma physicist runs a small company with a big idea for a new type of nuclear reactor that could produce clean, cheap energy. His secret recipe? High speeds, scorching temperatures and crushing pressure. In this hopeful talk, he explains how nuclear fusion might be just around the corner.

TED: Sarah Lewis: Embrace the near win - Sarah Lewis (2014)

At her first museum job, art historian Sarah Lewis noticed something important about an artist she was studying: Not every artwork was a total masterpiece. She asks us to consider the role of the almost-failure, the near win, in our own lives. In our pursuit of success and mastery, is it actually our near wins that push us forward?

TED: Matthew Carter: My life in typefaces - Matthew Carter (2014)

Pick up a book, magazine or screen, and more than likely you'll come across some typography designed by Matthew Carter. In this charming talk, the man behind typefaces such as Verdana, Georgia and Bell Centennial (designed just for phone books -- remember them?), takes us on a spin through a career focused on the very last pixel of each letter of a font.

© 2014   Created by FohBoh.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service